A fictional workshop models daily profit by P(q) = − 10(q − 2)(q − 8), where q is an integer number of items from 0 to 10 and P is in currency units. When is profit positive? Finding only the break-even values 2 and 8 is insufficient: we need the intervals between them.
Use factoring, quadratic equations and inequalities. This invented model applies only on its stated domain.
Why one test value works within an interval
The factor q − 2 changes sign only at 2; q − 8 only at 8. Left of 2 both are negative, between 2 and 8 their signs differ, and right of 8 both are positive. Their product has signs positive, negative, positive. The factor −10 reverses them: profit is positive for 2 < q < 8, hence integers 3,4,5,6,7. At q = 5, profit is 90; at 2 and 8 it is zero.
Zeros of factors and forbidden denominator values divide the line into intervals. Each factor keeps its sign inside each interval, so the product or quotient does too. A test value identifies the sign; it does not by itself prove that the sign cannot change. That follows from the expression’s structure. Rational inequalities, OpenStax §7.6.
A zero and a pole play different roles
For real x, solve:
((x − 1)^(2)(x + 2))/(x − 3) ≥ 0.
First x ≠ 3. Numerator zeros are −2 and 1. At 3 the denominator is zero and the numerator is not: this is a pole, excluded even for a non-strict inequality. At 1 the squared factor has even multiplicity and is positive on both sides. The sign therefore does not change there.
Quotient signs
R(x) = (x − 1)²(x + 2)/(x − 3)
| Interval | Sign | R(x) ≥ 0 |
|---|---|---|
| (−∞, −2) | + | ✓ |
| (−2, 1) | − | — |
| (1, 3) | − | — |
| (3, ∞) | + | ✓ |
Points: R(−2) = 0; R(1) = 0; x ≠ 3.
The interval signs are + , − , − , +. For ≥ 0, select positive intervals and admissible zeros:
( − ∞, − 2]∪{1}∪(3,∞).
One is an isolated solution: neighboring values are negative, but the value at 1 is zero. For strict > 0, neither −2 nor 1 would be included. Blindly alternating signs misses this feature. An odd power changes a factor’s sign across its zero; an even power does not. Root multiplicity, OpenStax §5.3.
Original exclusions survive cancellation. Not every forbidden point is a pole: (x − 1)/(x − 1) has a removable hole at 1, but 1 still cannot be included.
Branch · A radical inequalityDomain and signs first, then intervals.
When may we square both sides?
In √(x + 2) > x, require x ≥ − 2. On [ − 2,0), the left side is nonnegative and the right negative, so the inequality holds automatically. For x ≥ 0, both sides are nonnegative and squaring is equivalent: x + 2 > (x)^(2), or (x − 2)(x + 1) < 0. Thus − 1 < x < 2; intersecting with this case gives 0 ≤ x < 2. The union is [ − 2,2). The endpoint −2 works, 0 > − 2; 2 fails, since 2 > 2 is false.
Keep three separate pieces of information: signs on open intervals, values at zeros, and forbidden denominator values. Together they produce the complete answer.