Adding a half, a quarter and successive halves of each part never produces exactly one in finitely many steps. Why is its limit 1? A limit describes an approximation that can be made arbitrarily accurate; equality at an individual step is unnecessary. Prerequisites: hyperbola, graph transformations, geometric sums and radians.
S_(n) = (1)/(2) + (1)/(4) + ⋯ + (1)/((2)^(n)) = 1 − (2)^( − n), (lim)_(n→∞)S_(n) = 1.
The remainder is 2⁻ⁿ. For any prescribed positive error, a step can be chosen after which every remainder is smaller. After step ten it is below 0.001. “Every later term”, rather than a few good approximations, is what convergence requires. Infinity means the index increases without bound; it is not a number to substitute.
Approaching a point is different from evaluating there
g(x) = ((x)^(2) − 1)/(x − 1) = x + 1 (x ≠ 1), (lim)_(x→1)g(x) = 2.
At x=1 the denominator vanishes, so g(1) is undefined. For every nearby permitted x, however, the graph agrees with x+1 and approaches 2 from both sides. The limit definition concerns x≠a.
Continuity
Hole at x=1
Jump at x=1
The first panel f(x)=x+1 is continuous: its value and two-sided limit exist and agree:
(lim)_(x→a)f(x) = f(a).
The second lacks a value; filling its hole with 2 repairs it. The third hypothetical tariff is 1 for x<1 and 3 for x≥1. Left and right limits are 1 and 3, so no common limit exists: assigning one value cannot repair the jump. OpenStax
What an asymptote means
(lim)_(x→(0)^( + ))(1)/(x) = + ∞, (lim)_(x→(0)^( − ))(1)/(x) = − ∞; (lim)_(x→ ± ∞)(1)/(x) = 0.
For 1/x, x=0 is a vertical asymptote and y=0 a horizontal one. The two sides have different signs; infinity is not a finite limit. A general graph can cross a horizontal asymptote: its definition describes behavior far away.
Branch · DeeperOptional · may be skipped
When limit operations are valid
When both finite limits exist, the limit of a sum, difference or product is the corresponding operation on them. A quotient requires a nonzero denominator limit. A bounded monotone sequence converges; boundedness alone is insufficient, as (−1)ⁿ oscillates. Conditions follow the limit laws and monotone convergence theorem; general proofs are omitted here.
The fundamental trigonometric limit is:
(lim)_(x→0)(sinx)/(x) = 1.
The argument is in radians. Comparing triangle and sector areas in the unit circle gives cos x≤sin x/x≤1 for 0<x<π/2. Both bounds approach 1 and squeeze the expression to 1; evenness extends the result to negative x. With a degree argument the result would be π/180. Trigonometric limits.
Cauchy precision and continuity theorems
Assume domain points x≠a lie arbitrarily close to a. In the Cauchy definition, for every error ε>0 find a distance δ>0 such that all admissible x satisfy:
0 < ∣x − a∣ < δ ⇒ ∣f(x) − L∣ < ε.
Our g(x)=x+1 for x≠1 has |g(x)−2|=|x−1|, so δ=ε works. The distance depends on the requested precision, not on x chosen afterward. Precise definition.
The intermediate value theorem (Bolzano–Cauchy) says a continuous function on [a,b] takes every value between f(a) and f(b). Opposite endpoint signs therefore guarantee an interior zero. It guarantees existence, not uniqueness; without continuity the conclusion fails. Intermediate values.
Weierstrass’s theorems say continuity on a closed, bounded [a,b] guarantees boundedness and attainment of a maximum and minimum. For f(x)=x on open (0,1), boundary values 0 and 1 are never attained. The interval conditions matter; general proofs are omitted here. Extreme values.
Distinguish where values approach, what value is assigned at the point, and whether these agree. A hole and a jump give different answers even though both break continuity.