You have 560 currency units for materials. Delivery costs 80 and each kit costs 60. How many kits can you order? An equation finds exact spending; an inequality describes every order that fits the budget.
Start with real numbers and equations. All prices are hypothetical.
From a limit to a set
Let n count the kits. The condition 80 + 60n ≤ 560 means spending at most 560. Subtract 80 and divide by positive 60: n ≤ 8. The model also requires an integer n ≥ 0. The answer is {0,1,2,…,8}; zero means no order and no actual delivery. If an order must contain at least one kit, only 1–8 remain. Nine kits would cost 620.
For a real variable, x ≤ 8 instead describes ( − ∞,8]. A square bracket includes an endpoint; a parenthesis excludes it. Infinity is not a number on the line, so its end always takes a parenthesis. The strict inequality x < 8 excludes 8.
Why a negative multiplier reverses the sign
Adding the same number shifts both points equally and preserves their order. Positive scaling also preserves it; multiplying by −1 reflects the line: 2 < 5, yet − 2 > − 5.
Thus 7 − 2x > 1 gives − 2x > − 6, and division by −2 yields x < 3. Check: x = 2 gives 3 > 1; the endpoint x = 3 gives an excluded equality. A variable multiplier with unknown sign requires separate sign cases. Multiplication by zero destroys information altogether. Inequality properties, OpenStax §2.7.
“And” and “or” produce different sets
The conditions x > 1 and x ≤ 4 hold together on (1,4], their intersection. With x > 1 or x ≤ 4, at least one condition suffices, so the union is the entire real line. A system of inequalities means “and”; 1 < x ≤ 4 writes the same system compactly.
Intersection: both conditions
(1, ∞) ∩ (−∞, 4] = (1, 4]
Union: at least one
(1, ∞) ∪ (−∞, 4] = ℝ
Another example: x < 0 or x ≥ 3 gives ( − ∞,0)∪[3,∞). The gap from 0 to 3 is not filled. Requiring x < 0 and x ≥ 3 together instead gives an empty intersection, ∅.
Branch · Proving a boundA square is always nonnegative.
How to prove an estimate for every x
Every real x satisfies (x − 3)^(2) ≥ 0. Expanding gives (x)^(2) − 6x + 9 ≥ 0, hence (x)^(2) − 6x + 11 ≥ 2. Equality occurs at x = 3, so 2 is the attained lower bound, or minimum. Checking ten individual values would not prove this for every x.
Branch · MeansFor two nonnegative numbers a and b only.
The arithmetic mean is at least the geometric mean
From (√(a) − √(b))^(2) ≥ 0 we get a + b − 2√(ab) ≥ 0. Therefore (a + b)/(2) ≥ √(ab), with equality only when a = b. For 4 and 9, the arithmetic mean is 6.5 and the geometric mean is 6. This is the two-number AM–GM inequality; a,b ≥ 0 is already required for the real square roots.
Read the answer against every original condition: is an endpoint included, must all conditions hold together, and does the problem permit arbitrary real values? These questions turn an inequality sign into a precise description of what is possible.